- VAPOR RETARDERS: THE LITTLE DIFFERENCES COULD MEAN A LOT
- BY FRANK BITTING - LAMTEC CORPORATION
This article
has been updated from the original article published in Metal Architecture.
Extended service life and maximum energy savings
in a pre-engineered building will result from specifying the correct facing for the
insulation system. ASTM E-241-90 states "observations have shown that apart from
structural errors, a high percent of building construction problems are associated with
water."
Pre-engineered building specifiers and engineers
realize that Water Vapor Transmission Rate (WVTR) is a vital property because it protects
and enhances the overall effectiveness of the insulation system. To understand the crucial
role that an insulation facing plays in a pre-engineered building system, it is important
to understand the meaning of WVTR.
WVTR controls the rate of water vapor diffusion
through the facing and into the insulation. The lower the WVTR, the better the vapor
retarder. During changes in temperature and humidity, a difference in water vapor pressure
exists between the inside and outside of a building. This vapor pressure difference is the
driving force causing water vapor diffusion. Water vapor passing through the facing and
into the cold side of the insulation can condense and adversely affect insulative
properties. A good vapor retarder (facing) will resist this water vapor transfer caused by
the vapor pressure difference.
Liquid water resulting from condensation has a
thermal conductivity approximately fifteen times greater than most commercial thermal
insulations. The thermal conductivity of ice is almost four times greater than water. This
demonstrates the need to select facings with very low WVTR properties in climates and
applications where condensation may occur.
It is also important that all vapor retarder
closure systems or seams be sealed correctly. Even the best vapor retarder can be rendered
inadequate from leaky seams. All punctures, penetrations, and holes must be repaired with
tape to maintain continuity of the vapor retarder.
The chart below shows the relationship between
U.S. perm rates and the quantities of moisture that can diffuse through the various
facings. The calculations are based on 50,000 sq. ft. of facing, no leaks at the seams,
inside and outside temperatures at 73º F, with a 50% RH on one side of the facing and 0%
RH on the other (as outlined in ASTM E-96, Procedure A).

According to the
calculations, a facing with a WVTR of 1.0 U.S. perms will allow 50 gallons of water to
permeate into the insulation per week. This compares to 5 gallons per week for a facing
with perm rating of .09 and only 1 gallon per week for facing with perm rating of .02.
These figures, based on test conditions, show the difference a facing can make in
retarding moisture migration.
Results from full scale WVTR tests on roof
sections, conducted by Ron Raab at Johns Manvilles Research Center, show that with
identical vapor retarders, as insulation thicknesses increase, more moisture is diffused
through the retarder and a greater volume of water vapor can be held in the insulation
cavity. Raab's results point out the need for better vapor retarders on thicker insulation
systems.
Vapor retarder facings are available in a wide
variety of styles and performance properties. Styles range from plain white vinyl film to
laminated composites containing various combinations of aluminum foil, plastic films,
kraft papers, reinforcing yarns and fabrics. The facings differ in strength, color, light
reflectivity, and their ability to retard moisture migration into the insulation.
Properly designed pre-engineered buildings are
highly energy efficient and cost effective structures. By examining the properties
available in the various facings; architects, contractors, and builders can provide a
pre-engineered building with optimum thermal efficiency, structural integrity, and
enhanced interior aesthetics with minimal cost impact on the overall project.
ADDENDUM
Since this article was published, ASTM has
developed C1136, "Standard Specification for Flexible, Low Permeance Vapor Retarders
for Thermal Insulation". This specification addresses the need for better vapor
retarders and includes the following minimum requirements.
ASTM C1136 Physical Property Requirements
| Physical
Property |
Type |
I |
II |
III |
IV |
- Permeance, (Perm)
- (ng.Pa-1s-1m-1)
|
0.02
(1.15) |
0.02
(1.15) |
0.10
(5.75) |
0.10
(5.75) |
- Puncture Resistance, min
- Beach units (metric units)
|
50
(58) |
25
(29) |
50
(58) |
25
(29) |
- Machine Direction Tensile
- Min, lb/in. width (N/mm width)
|
45
(7.9) |
30
(5.3) |
45
(7.9) |
30
(5.3) |
- Cross Direction Tensile
- Min, lb/in. width (N/mm width)
|
30
(5.3) |
20
(3.5) |
30
(5.3) |
20
(3.5) |
Vapor retarders
with water vapor transmission rates greater that 0.10 perms are no longer acceptable for
low permeance applications.
In addition, NIAMA (North American Insulation
Manufacturing Association), formerly TIMA (Thermal Insulation Manufacturing Association),
recommends that metal building insulation be faced with a vapor retarder having a
permeance of not greater than 0.10 US perm.
Editors Note: Frank Bitting has over 36 years of industrial
experience and currently serves as Director of Research and Development for Flanders, New
Jersey based Lamtec Corporation. The company manufactures UL listed fire retardant vapor
retarders for use as insulation facings. Previously, he worked with Johns-Manville
Corporation from 1957-70 and Nashua Corporation from 1970-77 before joining Lamtec
Corporation in 1977 when the company began manufacturing. |